Sam Iles's Blog

I’ve been wondering for a while why the media and politicians keep pushing out the fact that the Bin Laden operation took “38 minutes”. I’ve header Hillary and El Presidente Obama and more saying it. It seems like such a piece of boring, inconsequential yet strangely accurate information to propagate. It isn’t “40 minutes” or “35 minutes”. I’ve been wondering why. I have the solution.

At first, I assumed it was so that someone could later be implicated or “un-implicated” with these accurate timings. In other words “person A clearly wasn’t in that place at that time because they were in that now famous [equally inexplicable] photograph in the war room”. I was wrong.

I was doing some Googling, searching for what 38 or 38 minutes could be. I have it:

You see, friends, the Stargate can only be open for a maximum of 38 minutes. That’s right. Any longer and it would require the energy of a nearby black hole to maintain it.

So the only reason I can come up with for the accuracy is that the government were using a Stargate portal device to beam the soldiers into Bin Laden’s compound and back out again. At least, something odd was going on with a Stargate. Perhaps Bin Laden was using one himself?

They must have been sat there, desperately hoping the 38 minutes wouldn’t elapse. That’s why Hillary looked so “shocked” – she was worriedly watching the clock.

Whatever happened: there are some odd, space-y goings on in Washington.

Update: Apparently this wasn’t blindingly obvious enough for some people: I do NOT genuinely believe that the American government has access to a Stargate.

Russia Says IMF Chief Jailed For Discovering All US Gold Is Gone

An interesting article (of many on the topic) that IMF Chief Strauss-Kahn may have been jailed in the US (just as he was about to leave) for discovering the US has run out of gold after they failed to deliver the agreed amount to the IMF.

After the earthquake in Haiti, former US Presidents Bush and Clinton set up a “charity” to help the victims.

I did get a little suspicious when Bush said to the American people, “lots of people want to send blankets or water – just send your cash” and Clinton said, “we just need cash”.

And, I’ve grown even more suspicious as the people of Haiti still live in squalid conditions. Cholera is rife and they still live in tents, with scarce supplies of water and food and medicine. All this, despite the fact that billions of dollars was collected from the American people alone, and billions more from the rest of the world.

My suspicions were confirmed recently when the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund announced it was spending $2 million on a hotel. Yes, a hotel. When hundreds of thousands of Haitians are dying from cholera, Clinton and Bush see fit to build a hotel (no doubt with a special Clinton suite for his holidays in this decidedly beautiful country…).

Of course, this is all under the guise of bringing economic prosperity to Haiti. But, is building hotels when thousands are still without homes and water really what the American people wanted when they “just sent their cash” to Haiti? I doubt it…

Vaccines are an odd topic. I’ve briefly expressed some views before but thought I should write a blog post to explain them further.

Vaccines – basically – are good. They can eradicate disease and save lives.

They are also rather dangerous and are where drug companies make most of their money.

Therein lies the problem. Vaccines are for making money and many companies will stop at nothing to make that money.

There are some crazy conspiracy theories out there. My favourite has to be that the government puts RFID chips into vaccines and uses it to track humans. This is entirely within the realms of the scientifically possible. But I don’t believe it.

What I do know, however, is that vaccines are unlike any other product in existence. If I plan to buy something, I research first and make an informed decision. Vaccines are different. Parents get their children jabs because they are told to by doctors (who in turn tell the government (or, vice-versa, a cynic might say…)).

It is so easy to pay a doctor to say something. Very easy. This is well documented as happening within every industry, because people always blindly trust science.

(A few months ago, for example, a group of scientists released a report saying chocolate was healthier for you than fruit. The mainstream media ate this up (pardon the pun) and all ran stories on it. A few days later, it was discovered that said report was financed by Hershey’s – the world’s largest chocolate manufacturer. Needless to say the media didn’t report this revelation at all.)

If science says you need a vaccine – you get a vaccine. Study after study (all financed by the companies who made the vaccine) conclude the vaccine is essential and safe. The government blindly agrees.

We also know that vaccines are the most important product to drug companies. They all openly admit in their investor information that this is the case. Take Alzheimer’s. 500,000 people in the UK have it. So, if I make a drug to cure it 500,000 people buy it from me. If, however, I make a vaccine – then all 65 million people in the UK buy it. This is obvious. And, it’s not a bad thing. It’s just worth understanding why vaccines are so important.

Vaccines safety is also dubious at best. There are many reports of vaccines making people very ill (such as the recent emergence that the miracle vaccine for the dreaded swine flu plague causes narcolepsy).

Vaccines don’t require anywhere near the same safety testing rigmarole regular drugs experience. A normal drug takes years of testing before it’s approved but vaccines take just months.

And – perhaps my favourite facet of vaccines – by decree of the Supreme Courts of the United States of America (and, soon the United States of Europe, I’ll wager) companies can’t be sued if the vaccine kills you or doesn’t work. Literally, they can’t be sued.

Imagine the protection this offers them: the can literally fill a vaccine with water or arsenic and nothing will go wrong for them.

My point is simply this: vaccines are not inherently a scam or evil. Just think about this: vaccines are perhaps the only product in the world which has a potential customer base of six billion, people blindly buy without knowing what it is and a product which carries complete legal immunity (pun, sorry). I just find it fascinating that a product can command such a high number of users because the company who makes it tells you to. Vaccines are literally the best product in the world – from the company’s point of view.

At the moment in the USA, the government is planning and building its high speed rail network.

Now, these high speed rail networks loose money pretty much worldwide. Out of a couple dozen of them worldwide, only two or three actually turn a profit.

But, that’s not what I want to mention.

I just want to touch on the revelation that Bin Laden had plans for blowing up a train in the USA (in fact, the USA is talking about plans to derail it into a valley or river or something).

This seems odd to me. They’re all up on trains and then they reveal information which could put the fear of God into any train user…? Why?

My theory is as follows: there is no reason at all why they should have released this information, so I think it could be fake. Even if it is real, the hypothesis and prediction is the same:

These supposed attacks will be used to close down the train networks. In recent months, the TSA has begun doing random, odd checks on trains (all to condition and prepare the slaves).

Now, we get word of an attack on trains, under the perfect guise of “we just killed Bin Laden” to once again make us think trains aren’t safe.

This is the same way they always do it.

So, I urge you to keep a lookout in the news over the coming months for similar train-terrosism links.

I give it five years before you can’t get on a train without getting a TSA x-ray…

sigh

Libya has been remarkably interesting over the last month or so. First, there were protestors. Then, there were armed protestors. Then, a UN resolution and “freedom fighters”. Now? Boots on the ground.

Firstly, let’s examine this UN Resolution 1973. First of all, don’t be taken in by the media pronouncing this as “nineteen-seventy-three” in an extremely successful bid to make you think it was formed in 1973 and therefore thoroughly tested and oh-so-important. I can’t count how many times I’ve heard some government somewhere say “it’s in the resolution, so it’s OK!” like it’s some document of awesome clearly explaining how to save civilians. It was actually formed on the 17th of March 2011, right in the middle of the uprising. They really should call it the “UN Resolution one-thousand, nine-hundred and seventy-three”. But, I digress.

It is to protect civilians, right? To save the lives of the brave freedom fighters? Partly, sure. It also provisions a no-fly zone (we’ll get to that later) and most bizarrely allows the member states to steal Gaddafi’s money. Oh, and his family’s money. Oh – best of all – the member states get control of something known as the “Libyan National Oil Corporation”. The justification given by the UN is that it represents a “potential source of funding for his regime”. You bet it does! And now this company – which totally dominates the Libyan oil industry – finances The United States of We Hate Gaddafi. We also get the Central Bank of Libya, the Libyan Investment Authority, the Libyan Foreign Bank and more. I’d say the USWHG is getting a hundreds of billion-dollar windfall pretty soon…

All of you complaining about the cost of this little operation? Well, don’t. Our governments don’t blindly go to war with countries unless we get a lot out of it.

(Of course, this is placed under the masquerade of “asset freeze”, suggesting it might become un-frozen at some point. Pretty unlikely given that Gaddafi is soon to be in jail or dead. That money’s in the bag now.)

So we have our little no-fly zone over Libya. I cannot begin to imagine what this is supposed to achieve. Does Gaddafi love the sky or something? Do we assume he will surrender immediately now we’ve taken his sky? (Yes, the official line is to stop him fictitiously bombing his people, but please…) So, we need to impose it, right?

No-fly zones traditionally work like this. You let the country know planes aren’t allowed. You get a blip on your radar of a plane. You send a F-16 to investigate. It flies alongside the offending plane and says, “dude, get out of the sky or we’ll blow you up”. The Dude lands. Problem, solved.

But, the USWHG takes a different approach. We bomb them! Missile after missile to stop them flying. Why – some missiles even hit Gaddafi’s compound!

Well, I knew Gaddafi was a little crazy, but I didn’t know he lived in an anti-aircraft missile system! WHO KNEW?!

Pleaseeee. How stupid do they think we are? (Well, very, apparently.)

Does the UN Res. allow this? Urm, no! Unless Gaddafi lives in an airport, it doesn’t. In fact, read the full document yourself. Does it mention that the first course of action is to bomb the place? No, I don’t think so.

This seems a good time to mention the most hilarious video I have ever seen in my life. You know the one: the media keeps showing a picture of a rebel fighter jet nose-diving into the desert. Um, what?! Firstly, where the hell did an organic rebel movement get a fighter jet? Someone had one lying around? Secondly, when planes go down, they don’t nose dive. The fall at an angle. This thing looks like it’s been dropped by God from above. This is clearly some b-roll footage. But, I digress.

So, we enforce our no-fly zone with our bombs and protect the civilians with our big hearts.

Oh – another thing – what is this crock of crap being pushed on us about Gaddafi killing his people – slaughtering his people – left, right and centre by the tens of thousands. Where is this footage? Where is this evidence? Anything shown is non-descript b-roll of people sat in a desert (the same stuff they show for Iraq, and Afghanistan and every other country with sand). But, I digress.

But, we still have Gaddafi in power? Not going fast enough, huh? (I remind you of Mr Obama saying expressly that they expected the operation to be complete “in days, not weeks”. Well, it’s been a month, so, yeah…) But, we promised there would never, ever, be any boots on the ground, right?

Turns out – even that rule doesn’t matter. Because today – in what I consider to the single most unconscionable act perpetrated by this coalition government here in the UK – the gov announced that British military officers will be sent to Libya to advise rebels fighting Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s forces.

Pardon me for being naive, but, do these officers float? Because that sure sounds like boots on the ground to me…

BUT – DON’T WORRY! The gov has a solution to this. Hague, the UK’s Foreign Minister says it doesn’t constitute boots on the ground because – although they will be carrying guns – these military officers won’t be wearing their uniforms.

HOW. STUPID. DO. THEY. THINK. WE. ARE?

Boots on the ground aren’t boots on the ground if they’re wearing their weekend outfits? This is just horrific. Also, they’re carrying guns BUT if they fire those guns, they’ll be in direct violation of UN Resolution one-thousand, nine-hundred and seventy-three, and we’ll be as good as at war with Libya. Why not just give them water pistols?

Then we come to the final crux of it all – the blatant picking-and-choosing of our morals. Countries all over the middle east are killing their people right now. But, we don’t have a problem with that. They don’t have banks and giant investment companies and huge oil reserves which we can take control of, so why bother.

This whole thing has been entirely for our gain, entirely orchestrated from the outset and should be entirely against the conscience of any citizen of the United States of We Hate Gaddafi. Why aren’t we marching on the streets? Why haven’t we thrown these people out of government? Why don’t we care? Are we really that blind to the ways of the world that we just ignore and happily move on?

You know, talk of Syria getting a no-fly zone has already begun. Expect to watch the exact same scheme unfold because they know we just go along with it.

sigh Please, people, just try to care…

Update: I think it’s worth noting that it is now my belief that this is a test of public reaction. Today, Obama announced that predator drones will now be deployed in Libya (these are the ones which blow up funerals and schools in Afghanistan). It isn’t yet clear whether or not these drones will be used purely for reconnaissance or for bombing, too. Anyway, it’s odd that this is just after the UK announced its boots on the ground which aren’t boots on the ground, and just after the US announced its non-lethal aid. It seems to me this is all a build up to a full blown invasion. Handing out these small bits to the public and seeing how they take it (a collective “meh” so far) follows history (especially the way the UK is used as a beta test) and implies something big is coming. Anyway – just a thought/prediction.

If you’ve watched Comedy Central at all lately you may have noticed than when the show ends and they switch to a commercial break, the screen flickers for a split second and a large amount of text is shown. I thought I’d better find out what it was.

It’s genius. And what I’d like to see more of in the world:

(Forgive the pause graphic, but I couldn’t be bothered to get my capture card out…)

A few days ago, thousands of birds (crows and one duck) fell from the sky, dead in Arkansas, USA. Nobody knows why. Hours later the feds arrive in full on bio-hazard gear to clear the birds up. BIO-HAZARD GEAR. Y’know, the big white ones with masks and the like.

And what are we told? Fireworks. I kid you not. The principal theory put forth by the government is that the birds were “startled” by fireworks and had thousands of simultaneous heart attacks. It really is laughable. Other theories suggested range from “hail” to “stress”. I do not joke, friends. We are being told that the birds we’re either “startled” or “stressed”. Stressed?! What do birds have to be stressed about? One or two, perhaps. But, thousands?

Allow me to share my theory.

This was done entirely on purpose. Here is why:

Bird flu. All this was part of a plan by the government, drug companies, New World Order, whoever, to kill some birds so they could say “HEY LOOK THE BIRDS ARE DYING! THAT MUST BE BIRD FLU! QUICK! HAVE YOUR FLU SHOTS! BUY VACCINES!!!!!” People associate one type of flu with the other and, after the media blows it out of proportion, everyone scrambles to buy flu shots.

We all know that vaccines are where drug companies make their money, most of them are entirely bogus and not needed. The more fear they can plant in us, the better.

But, it went wrong. Too many damn birds died. They had to abort their plan. But, they realised that “bird flu” would reveal their plan too early, so they scrambled for ideas and throw “fireworks” at us. I mean, why send in men in bio-hazard suits to deal with firework induced death? Makes no sense.

You know what makes this most obvious? In the media reports, nobody has mentioned bird flu. Surely, in this were a natural event, the idea the birds all contracted a disease that spread among them seems the most plausible and obvious, right? So why not say it? Why tell us obviously insane ideas like “fireworks” and “stress”? Surely bird flu would at least make the list of possible scenario. But, it doesn’t even get a mention.

I’m telling you: this is solely an attempt to muster bird flu fear that went wrong. Or at least, that’s what I think…